- Joined
- May 21, 2020
he shoved things up his butt for a catfish.Is Adam Kovic the dude that shoved stuff up his butt?
he shoved things up his butt for a catfish.Is Adam Kovic the dude that shoved stuff up his butt?
There's genuinely horrific pedocows who get discussed here. Kovic isn't that. Kovic is just a sad man with a small penis who got catfished and shoved things up his butt.If the recipient is not underage, it seems pretty harmless tbh
I'm assuming that they are automatically generated and emailed out, and they sent one of them far too early. This service probably relies on the receiver freaking out and giving into their demands, a lot like debt collection agencies who do nothing but send letters out.Why is the last one dated February 21st? That's 9 days from now.
There is no such thing as “a legal document”. Any document can be used in evidence if it’s relevant and not privileged.As a side thought, as it was incorrectly dated, does this mean it ceases to be a legal document?
Every cow would see an improvement if they just let themselves be forgotten, yet some want the attention, while Adam sees forgetting as too passive, like the Streisand effect doesn't apply to him.I feel like if there were pictures of my dick on the internet, and I didn’t want pictures of my penis on the internet, and those pictures were in the hands of insane autists and the person in charge of the insane autists didn’t take down other things after being harassed by an insane cross dresser with a crossbow or a retarded Brit, my best course of action would be to stop bringing up how said website has pictures of my genitals and just wait for it to die down.
But then I’m not Adam Kovic and I didn’t cheat on my wife or send dick pics to strange women in hopes that I could have extramarital affairs with them.
Probably another “entrepreneur” like all the other ones. I bet their LinkedIn profile is full of pics of them looking at their phone while standing next to some showroom lambo.DMCA.com has a very easy grift. All they do is send pre-packaged emails to internet retards and hope the official-sounding language and big scary official-sounding domain name causes them to submit.
Who are the people behind this giga-grift?
Yes. Also jerked off at work and allegedly didn't wash his hands after.Is Adam Kovic the dude that shoved stuff up his butt?
I agree with whoever said he should make a book out of these exchanges.Nulls' DMCA takedown responses should be on world star. The wordsmanship of this roast was just top tier
Adam didn’t just get lucky with Ryans bullshit, both these fucks got lucky that this story came out two weeks before the most controversial election in US history and EVERYTHING that has happened since. In much slower news cycles, these two stories would’ve gotten way more attention. I recall significantly less lurid stories around youtubers and gamers getting way more attention back in the day. Imagine if this broke at the height of the “#metoo” a few years back?Adam got unbelievably lucky when Ryan Haywood got revealed to be an actual predator; it massively overshadowed his embarrassing leak. Everyone just had a laugh, forgot about Adam, and focused on Ryan being a creep. And now he wants to draw attention back to himself with this. Adam my dude what are you doing? You're not supposed to cut the strings to your golden parachute
Yes. Also jerked off at work and allegedly didn't wash his hands after.
Interestingly, if you pay for full service, DMCA.com offers a money back guarantee. If your content doesn't come down, they refund your money. What they don't do is provide legal services. They make you a package and refer you out-of-house for that.
View attachment 1916633
Clearly this is a lie or they would have noticed that Josh runs both the website and host making their effort redundant in sending it to both. Unless for some reason it was Adam who kept saying just send letters to everyone and anyone as long as the content gets taken down. Wonder how much it cost them to buy DMCA.com?We do all the relevant research, contacting, emailing and followup ext.
Is this true the work must be removed before a counter claim be filed? So the two options with a claim is remove it and file a counter or refuse/dispute the claim and wait for the people who filed the DMCA take down to file an actual lawsuit?Note: Often there is confusion regarding the counter claim process as prescribed in the ACT and the initial takedown request. Your client cannot initiate a counter claim as per the DMCA Act UNTIL the content has been removed. A counter claim or claim of legitimate ownership cannot block the content being removed for the stipulated length of time with the Act.
The counsel in this case is adversarial and their legal advice should be discarded.Is this true the work must be removed before a counter claim be filed? So the two options with a claim is remove it and file a counter or refuse/dispute the claim and wait for the people who filed the DMCA take down to file an actual lawsuit?