• ”I don't believe I've ever posted about my anus but I could be wrong. I do drink.”

Science A brief history of the “walking simulator,” gaming’s most detested genre

Discussion in 'Articles & Happenings' started by CatParty, Nov 14, 2017.

Forum Guidelines
  • Don't post if you have nothing to say. If anyone could write your post, it doesn't need to be made. One-word replies are automatic 1-month bans from this board.
  • Hide your powerlevel. Avoid revealing intimate, personal details about yourself in public boards. These threads are not your personal blog and we are not an asylum.
  • Create accurate topic titles. Threads should be labeled correctly and avoid sensationalist language.
  • Cite an article. This board is for content aggregation and should feature at least one source.


  1. https://www.salon.com/2017/11/11/a-...alking-simulator-gamings-most-detested-genre/

    The idea that someone could feel entitlement over someone else's video game might sound slightly absurd. But in the notoriously clannish world of video gaming, having strong opinions over the industry’s cultural mores (and having male anatomy) is the bar to entry for “gamer culture” — a phrase that encapsulates the notion that video game players across the world have their own linked culture and set of values. In 2016 — just after the horrific “Gamergate” faux-controversy, a coordinated attack on female game critics, thinly veiled as an “examination into video game journalism ethics” — gamer culture homed in on a new target: an entire genre of games that they referred to, pejoratively, as “walking simulators.”

    To explain why “walking simulators” — the concept, and their proliferation — made so many people so angry, it’s best to first explain the history of the modern-day gaming complex. Video games, like so much of the technology we now use regularly, sprang from the military-industrial complex. The first video games were war games, commissioned and designed by the Department of Defense for the explicit purpose of simulating war with the Soviet Union. Many of the design aspects of video games today still borrow from war games: the use of a “heads up display,” the onslaught of enemy targets, the vast predilection for violence, and even the staggering amount of money the Pentagon spends financing the video gaming world — so much so, in fact, that the Pentagon considers video games one of their key recruitment tools.

    Walking simulators aren’t the first games to buck these militaristic conventions, but their mechanics vary furthest from the video game’s original design. And while walking simulators may vary wildly in execution, they tend to have a few key similarities. Most lack puzzles or any sort of barrier to experiencing the narrative, with the exception of finding objects. You cannot fail a task in a way that forces you to repeat it, and you cannot die. Most of these games prioritize some kind of storytelling, be it linear or variable depending on your in-game decision making. A few are known for being quite beautiful — a fact that has made entries like “Firewatch,” a game where you play as a park ranger, more susceptible to backlash. The examples that follow all have one thing in common: at least one source derogatorily labeled them as a walking sim.

    The Guardian referred to walking sims as a “new sub-genre of games,” but they aren’t, on a very mechanical level, completely new. Exploration — a sub-genre of adventure — traces back to the 1980s, and in 2003, Mary Flanagan created “[domestic],” an interactive experience that repurposes early first-person-shooter environments to reconstruct a childhood memory of a fire. It was an early example of a digital experience that most closely resembles what we might consider a modern day “walking simulator.” And the term “walking sim” began appearing on forums, as an insult, in the late 2000s.

    While all genre classification is, in some way, reductive, “walking sim” is reductive in a profoundly annoying way. Pretty much all games are basically walking sims, right? You literally walk from place to place and then do a thing. The insult is in categorizing a genre by its limitation, rather than its capability: in walking sims, according to critics, all you do is walk. In “Assassin’s Creed,” a wildly popular role-playing game (RPG), “tourism mode” is the “walking sim” version. As Jake Elliott — one of the three creators of “Kentucky Route Zero,” another game that has endured the walking sim designation — keenly points out, “people buy into the term in order to talk about what is missing.”

    This is understandable. “Gone Home,” an award-winning point-and-click game that puts you in the shoes of a college student returning home from break only to find her family missing, resembles an Escape Room without the pressure to escape. “To the Moon,” an adventure game about a dying man who wishes to be implanted with artificial memories, was built on the same engine as a number of RPGs, but offers a different kind of experience — one that may feel like a limitation to a gamer who has a different set of expectations for that kind of in-game environment.

    But the evolution of art often happens under the pressure of limitation. Larger, mainstream game designers have millions of dollars at their disposal; with money on the line, there’s a prerogative not to toy with the standard design formulae that consumers have come to expect. Take, for example, “Call of Duty,” a popular war-themed series of video games, that has released upwards of ten sequels. This is to say: the gaming industry suffers a mild version of the movie industry’s “sequelitis.”Meanwhile, walking sims – often produced on a dime by indie studios — have to motivate a player using a non-standard set of tools.

    Sean Krankel, co-creator of “Oxenfree”—a game about a teen girl and her friends getting trapped on a haunted island—notes the difficulty of creating “a game that feels like it has a threat when the player can’t die.” Thus, he and co-creator Adam Hines put energy into world building. This isn’t anything new. The acclaimed RPG “Skyrim built much of its world around a core enemy, the dragon, within the first five minutes. But dragons are terrifying precisely because they can kill you. “Oxenfree,” instead, saddles your dialogue choices with lasting consequences. You can’t physically kill anyone, but you can make them hate you and each other, and at one point, potentially leave one of them behind on an island. The threat of leaving your friends to die is honestly scarier than dying yourself and reloading to the last save point.

    “In most games, your power is combat,” Sean explains, “In 'Oxenfree,' your ability to talk is your superpower.” He and Adam wanted to defy the trend of “buttoning through dialogue” that plagues many premier gaming titles, by making dialogue occur in real time. “Your dialogue choice—or your choice not to speak—not only impacts the character you’re talking to, but also the opinions of the other characters in the game, who might be listening at any given time,” Sean says, “and in “Oxenfree,” there are different versions of all people.” It worked. After the “first playtest someone threw the controller on the ground because the game was too scary” Sean says.

    Perhaps the walking sim’s greatest power is how it makes players recognize and consider such decisions and the way they influence gaming outcomes and environments. A number of traditional big-budget titles don’t demand this kind of moral engagement, which makes sense—asking a player to stop and consider the horrible things they’re doing is antithetical to moving forward.

    Walking sims also serve as a good conduit for newcomers. This is a dirty concept to gamers who value the arcane knowledge that comes with mastery, and apparently don’t want other people to become gamers. “We want our games to be accessible to people who don’t normally game,” says Nina Freeman, a level designer at Fullbright, the studio that published “Gone Home” and “Tacoma.” “Even exploring a space in the first person context is confusing for a number of older players,” Freeman added.

    This isn’t to say that the walking sim’s primary value is to be a game for those who don’t know how to play games. To the contrary, titles like “The Stanley Parable”—a game where a narrator issues missives to the player and then makes sassy commentary regarding the player’s decision to follow or ignore said missive—are accessible to newcomers, but even funnier to players who get punished for doing things that classic games encourage.

    Fail states also imply that a game must be annoying, and sometimes unplayable, for people who aren’t already good at them. Even a popular, classic arcade game like “Mario Bros” requires a phenomenal amount of repetition in order to clear a cliff or avoid getting killed by a Piranha Plant. This type of challenge makes sense in some games, but in titles with strong narratives more akin to novels, this type of gatekeeping can feel like an impediment to accessing the story. “We want the mechanics in our games to enhance, not get in the way, of the experience,” said Amy and Ryan Green, co-creators of “That Dragon, Cancer,” an autobiographical game about caring for their infant son as he undergoes treatment for terminal cancer.

    Many walking sims take inspiration from the mechanics of classics and mainstream, big-budget titles and repurpose them — akin to how other smartphone apps have begun parroting Tinder’s swiping interface. “Kentucky Route Zero,” a “magical realist” video game about a fictitious eponymous highway only accessible through an alternate dimension, features a map that pays homage to the "Mario Bros" concept of a schematic map connecting disparate locations. “That Dragon, Cancer,” includes a number of familiar “mini-games” — smaller games within the context of the larger game, and a design trope that dates back at least to the “Legend of Zelda” series games in the 1980s. As Amy Green told Salon, “people complained to us that the mini-games weren’t very good — but that wasn’t really the point. We weren’t trying to make the best, hardest-to-beat mini-game. We were delivering our story in a format that expanded on familiar video game tropes.”

    “Others who had never heard of ‘walking sims’ were upset that we would make a game about cancer in the first place,” Green added. She continued: “They assumed there had to be something gamified about treatment, and were deeply offended. Their opinions changed when they actually played the game, and realized we had built something completely different, something completely new.”

    This kind of upending of expectation is important. Even the type of walking sim that tends to accrue the most backlash — the novel-esque ones with linear storylines where, unlike “Oxenfree” or “The Walking Dead,” you can’t manipulate the environment or the outcome — offers its own form of innovation. Where one player may get annoyed by the lack of agency in “Firewatch,” another may delight in the desperation in the illusion of choice. “Kentucky Route Zero” makes its own compelling roast of late-stage capitalism, in a different way from “Bioshock”’s violence and depravity. “Just walking still gives a sense of involvement,” Kan Gao, creator of “To The Moon,” told Salon. “Most people don’t want to admit it because it’s dumb. But even standing by something creates closeness to a story.”

    In true form, the reification of the label “walking simulator” does a better job of describing the kinds of people who create such labels than it does the games it purports to define. The bevy of mainstream backlash coincided not with the creation of walking sims, but rather with the positive critical acclaim of walking sim titles like “Dear Esther” and “Gone Home,” and later “Firewatch” and “The Vanishing of Ethan Carter.” Critics resisted the inclusion of walking sims in the greater gaming oeuvre. Though the label has become nearly neutralized as a descriptor—“walking sim” is a searchable genre on the game distribution platform Steam, along with “adventure” or “narrative” game—people still get stuck on the idea of these games as subtractive, rather than additive.

    Something similar happened with the pejorative labeling of the walking sim’s lesser known cousin, the “empathy game” — as if there were something dirty about provoking emotions. But the best kinds of games provoke some kind of emotion. That’s storytelling 101. Almost every positive review of the critically-successful title “Bioshock Infinite” praised the emotional fluency of Booker DeWitt’s relationship with Elizabeth—the AI companion that drives 80% of the narrative, tosses you much needed supplies mid-combat, and possesses essential, gameplay changing abilities. Again, this points to the subtractive in a way that is actively damaging. “I hate it when people call “To The Moon” the game that makes them cry,” says Kan Gao. “It sets them up to be closed off to the story.”

    A year has passed since the discontent over walking sims went viral. Developers that I spoke to expressed a common sentiment: the label hadn’t really done anything to change the way they developed games. In 2016, nearly half of the BAFTA Games Awards winners were indie games, three of which were walking sims. And the pseudo-genre’s popularity show no signs of abetting. “Art gets criticized at the end of each movement,” Josh Larson, developer on “That Dragon, Cancer,” told Salon. The kinds of gaming experiences that are often rejected on gaming PC’s or consoles (known for attracting “hardcore” gamers, those more likely to feel entitlement around game design tropes) are routinely delighting people over augmented and virtual reality.

    The Fullbright Company recently released “Tacoma,” and the “Kentucky Route Zero” team are working on the next episodic installment. Night School Studio, Freebird Games, and Numinous Games are all working on titles for release in the coming year. Other indie studios have popped up to fill an increasing demand. As far as deterrents go, it appears the pejorative label may not have had any effect: Not only is the “walking sim” here to stay, but it may well be the most artful and innovative genre within video gaming.
    • Winner Winner x 3
    • Informative Informative x 3

    CatParty Boo
    True & Honest Fan

  2. "Gatekeeping"


    So every narrative heavy game should just consist of unchallenged walking with quick time events? Wait.. no... that might impede accessing the story to those who don't push the button in time and they, god forbid, might have to try more than once to succeed.
    • Agree Agree x 12
    Graffiti canvas

    True & Honest Fan

  3. Honestly, mentioning Gone Home favorably alongside To The Moon tells me that this person's interest in these games is based solely on the fact that they're narrative heavy and nothing else. To The Moon has interesting characters, a solid premise, good writing and possesses a framing device that calls for the player to get engaged with the game. Gone Home is about walking through a house finding notes. Whether or not you were engrossed with the story is entirely subjective, but it's a game not worth it's asking price of twenty dollars for what amounts to forty minutes of gameplay at most. It's not even like the premise doesn't work either. What Remained of Edith Finch had that exact premise and did it much better.
    • Agree Agree x 22
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Informative Informative x 2
    • Semper Fidelis Semper Fidelis x 1
    #3 Magic Sun Daddy, Nov 14, 2017
    Last edited: Nov 14, 2017
    Magic Sun Daddy

    Magic Sun Daddy Get on the ball, bitch.

  4. Just play visual novels or point and clicks. There's no need to walk around doing basically nothing when it would be easier and less involved to create some stills or simple animations you can click though. It seems a waste to create a 3D world where all you do is walk around wading through a story.

    I played Gone Home because I was misled into thinking it was a horror game. I expected something like the main character coming home to find her family brutally slaughtered. Or even a ghost story. Like the main character was dead the whole time and no one was home because they went to the morgue to identify her body. What I got was a lame and exceptional story about two very irresponsible and immature lesbians throwing their futures away for teenage love. One of who was AWOL. But love is love right?

    Had it been a horror game I think that it might have been fun for a playthrough. I did enjoy picking up random objects and looking at them. But it was novelty since I was doing it virtually. You realise at some point that it's pointless because you can just as easily go through your real life cupboards for free.

    The Vanishing of Ethan Carter? Sounds like a Lifetime movie.:lol:

    Seriously, I hate titles like that "The Haunting of". "The Vanishing of". There's so many in the same vein. It sounds so Lifetime and stupid it makes me not even want to bother.
    • Agree Agree x 9

    Dysnomia Bah humbug!

  5. And yet a major SJW gaming publication just posted an article demanding Cuphead atone for racism done decades before by unrelated people.
    • Winner Winner x 25
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  6. My problem with walking simulator games is that most don’t actually have a good story. Dear Esther and Gone Home both being great examples. The one walking simulator I do like is one that does something more interesting with the concept, where it has you play as a blind girl so you can only get ideas about the environment by walking up to it.
    • Agree Agree x 6
    • Like Like x 1
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
    A Welsh Cake

    A Welsh Cake Like pork but a bit of a stronger taste.

  7. No mention of the original walking simulator?
    • Winner Winner x 10
    • Like Like x 1
    • Feels Feels x 1
  8. It shouldn't take the author 20 paragraphs about video games to say "people who care about video games are stupid meanies".
    • Agree Agree x 23
    • Winner Winner x 6
    • Feels Feels x 1
    Alec Benson Leary

    Alec Benson Leary Creator of Asperchu
    Christorical Figure

  9. It's more like, "People don't like the games that I like and that means they're stupid"

    Edit: Now that I think about it, this mentality is a lot like that Oscar speech that Meryl Streep did where she thumbed her nose at people who enjoyed football and mma.
    • Agree Agree x 9
    • Like Like x 1
    #9 Magic Sun Daddy, Nov 14, 2017
    Last edited: Nov 14, 2017
    Magic Sun Daddy

    Magic Sun Daddy Get on the ball, bitch.

  10. honestly though i don't hate walking sims but man i can only think of 3 i actually liked
    • Agree Agree x 2

    ZehnBoat Cmaj9add4add6(b13)(b5)

  11. I played Euro Truck Simulator for a day, joined the ADF the next day. Coincidence? I think not...
    • Informative Informative x 6

    Furina Centerfold

  12. Doesn't the backlash against Dear Esther and Gone Home predate Gamergate?

    I recall seeing that Explorer game on the Top 100 Worst Games list on Lemon64. I guess walking simulators weren't that well received back then either.

    The main difference between Gone Home and To the Moon is that the latter was at least marketed honestly and didn't cost freaking twenty freaking bucks.
    Also I think that TtM has better story, but I guess it's subjective. All GH does is preying on nostalgia and flaunting its progressivity.

    I know a great way to put a story on a screen without gatekeeping it with challenging mechanics.
    It's called "movie".
    • Winner Winner x 6
    • Agree Agree x 4
    • Like Like x 2
  13. Catparty, you are a beacon of hope and progress in these dark times.
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 5
    • Agree Agree x 1
  14. Seems like the same old song and dance about muh gamers being Nazis for not liking schlock like Gone Home. The "games are an extension of the military industrial complex" angle is a new one, though :story:
    • Like Like x 5
    • Agree Agree x 3
    Trash Eater

    Trash Eater Keeper of the Ali Baba sword

  15. All I had to read was "coordinated attack on female game critics" and I already knew how it would turn out.
    • Agree Agree x 10
    • Feels Feels x 9

    m0rnutz Not a furry

  16. Was Myst a walking sim? Or did it have too many puzzles?
    • Like Like x 3

    neverendingmidi it just goes on and on and on and on...

  17. It's nice to know that Salon still believes in the false narrative about GG.
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Feels Feels x 2

    REGENDarySumanai Man of excellent taste

  18. What is wrong with people?
    • Agree Agree x 8
    • Feels Feels x 3
  19. Yes but revisionist history means gamergate created men and misogyny.
    • Agree Agree x 5
    Racist Trash

    Racist Trash Fucking Lidl doesn't have any Custard Creams.

  20. I liked To The Moon, it had some ideas that I hadn't seen before.
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Informative Informative x 1

    Directing Et hätt noch emmer joot jejange

  • About Us

    The Kiwi Farms is about eccentric individuals and communities on the Internet. These people are commonly referred to as Lolcows and are each distinct thanks to their erratic public behavior. Spectators are encouraged to join discussion. The wealth of opinions and knowledge shared by users is what has enabled this peculiar fringe community to thrive despite the incredible adversity and contention brought by those we discuss.

    We do not place intrusive ads, host malware, sell data, or run crypto miners with your browser. If you experience these things, you have a virus. If your malware system says otherwise, it is faulty.

  • Supporting the Forum

    BTC: 1LXpv9FUiazGB2LVyS44cTTEQFc8CBgPYi

    BTC+SW: bc1qwv5fzv9u6arksw6ytf79gfvce078vprtc0m55s

    ETH: 0xc1071c60ae27c8cc3c834e11289205f8f9c78ca5

    LTC: LNjmyhxThrTMY4izBdcdWqvW287LmCB6bg

    XMR: 438fUMciiahbYemDyww6afT1atgqK3tSTX25SEmYknpmenTR6wvXDMeco1ThX2E8gBQgm9eKd1KAtEQvKzNMFrmjJJpiino

Copyright © 2016 Lolcow LLC
This website may contain offensive or adult content.
Discontinue browsing if it is illegal or against your wishes to see such material.
All content belongs to their respective authors and does not represent Lolcow LLC.
We have not been served any secret court orders and are not under any gag orders.