- Dec 8, 2020
I thought the standard about obscenity was that it has no "artistic or medical" value, but maybe it's phrased differently in the UK.Pornography is obscenity, so yeah that wouldn't fall under free speech, though today's society not only tolerates, but consumes the most degenerate porn imaginable. Pornography during the inception of the First Amendment was something about a pair of tits, a slit, and a rod, in erotic positions. Even the playboy stuff would be frowned upon. Nowadays? From bestiality... I mean interracial to incest. I can see it becoming a problem in the next 4 years. At least Japanese shit is highly regulated, yet companies still find loopholes.
You're not wrong though. Pro-free-speech is mostly a victimhood complex. Lefties were whinging about it back when atheism+ was a thing, and further back during Bush.
I propose a new logo for the website. Paypal my $1488 in royalties to [email protected].
View attachment 1805295
also lol, nice logo