And that shit wasn't even a one off. He goes on at length about "is it as bad to have sex with a mature and developed 14 year old as it is to have sex with an undeveloped 14 year old" in full version of that Sky News interview. Keep in mind that they mercifully left that stuff on the cutting room floor and Carl the genius uploaded the full version himself, as "exoneration"Yup. He already did. Not across the board though, so it's okay.
Geez, that's another shining example of how brainless, autistic, and spineless Carl's "debating" method is. If things start going in a way you're not prepared for, be as evasive and indirect as possible! Well it didn't work out so well that time, did it Smuckles? Because sometimes you have to give someone a straight, absolute answer, and sometimes that answer should be easy, like if someone asks if an adult fucking a child on the cusp of puberty is okay.
Carl's problem is that he's a mediocre neckbeard who's been convinced by a fandom of even dumber neckbeards who are gay for his British accent that he's a genius. He'd actually probably be a significantly better debater if he stopped trying to be fucking clever and was honest instead.