He claims it's defunct but then again he claims so many things.In all fairness, speaking as an adult heterosexual woman who has, in fact, seen circumcised (as well as intact) penises before: I'm genuinely not sure how erect this ... erm ... thing is.
So sorry for the potential TMI but: it looks sort of ... floppy ... for a proper erection. And sort of ... structured ... for flaccid state.
Does he have erectile dysfunction?
Also: I'm going to get drunk now, having seen THE THING and then somehow thought it was a good idea to describe it in words ... bleurgh!
He wouldn't say (BCHRT) which bit worked and which bit didn't, being "intersex" and all, "it's complicated". This from a bloke who wanted his vulva waxing but it turned out he hadn't a clue what a vulva was/where it was (one of my favourite things to come out of the BCHRT fiasco).Didn't he also claim he had two sets of fully functioning genitalia, though?
Then again: as you correctly observe, what on earth HASN'T he claimed at this point?
Also, having seen THE PICTURE, my memory and cognitive functions may or may not be affected by minor PTSD, so what the fuck do I even knkw anymore?!
Poor sod was totally misunderstood throughout.