I dunno, people are supposed to dismiss him because he supports capitalism, with caveats, and he's a christian who is has sincere doubts about the divinity of Christ? Again it just feels like weak tea and an ideological bone to pick. You might as well just say "kermit man bad".Jordan Peterson is a "thinker" that gets paid millions and barely reads his oponents or his allies. (He thinks derrida was the most evil man and didn't even read him). He suffers from the Sargon pest of believing he's smarter than he acutally is. For that alone he should be
shot in the back of the headmocked senslesly.
He's a mystic (wtf is a precosmogonic egg ) that has the balls to use neurosciences as justification for his ideas and a Christian who doesn't have the balls to say if he actually believed in the resurrection of Jesus Christ. He's also a conservative boomer that sees nothing wrong in today's cut-throat, race-to-the-bottom capitalism.
VIVA LA REVOLUCIONBut he's so milktoast that Zizek made him say in the debate that yeah, perhaps capitalism should be better controlled. So much for having conviction, bucko. Sadly neither of the two minds in the "debate of the century" (bleh!) managed to come up with tangible "hows". Shameful.
He just seems to be your typical quirky academic with the usual basket of pet theories a number of which are undoubtedly bad. And that''s pretty much as far as it goes.