Oh, this explains the username. You're a rapefugee.But they did censor galileo for his observations and measurements anyways.
Would you rather me use 8chan's ban as the example? Or are you going to pout about how big tech actually helps "advance science" and "educate the world"
Either you're very young, or you have zero understanding of objectivity and subjectivity to say such a thing. There are exactly zero professional researchers who would claim that their branch of science, whether it's physics or literature analysis, is really objective, simply because absolute objectivity is impossible for human beings. Our most objective sciences are only our best shot at being objective, and if you can't accept that there is no point in even having discussion about subjectivity vs. objectivity in the first place.I dislike subjectivity because it is clearly destroying society. Trying to assume my reasoning is disingenuous.
Nearly anything can be measured, but we can not measure everything that we can measure. We have to make choices.2.Everything can be measured
Have you ever considered that a purely materialist outlook, with productivity as highest virtue and material reward as highest incentive might not be the ultimate way of conceptualising the world?Rejects the existence of equality, and strives to create a system which actively seeks to measure the most productive/most efficient members of society and reward them for their worth and reward them proportionately.