Sophie Labelle Verville / Guillaume Labelle / Assigned Male / Candycore Comics / Pastel Sexy Times / WafflesArt - Obnoxious webcomics and horrific porn by a crazy fat pedo troon

Rubberchickenchu

Zap to the CIStem
kiwifarms.net
Screenshot_2021-05-04 Sophie Labelle.png


Screenshot_2021-05-04 Sophie Labelle(1).png

The author was already mentioned in this thread

Screenshot_2021-05-04 Sophie Labelle(2).png

181023532_305541770936930_384624509964684688_n.jpg
 

BScCollateral

kiwifarms.net
Didn't she literally just say that trans women shouldn't be in women's sports because if I misread that I take back what I said about her being fucking based.

I know what you mean, but ... why does Golf have a male/female split anyway? Is raw power that much of the game?

And it's not like a woman golfer is likely to get injured playing against a man, unless it's me.
 

FencePost

kiwifarms.net
I know what you mean, but ... why does Golf have a male/female split anyway? Is raw power that much of the game?

And it's not like a woman golfer is likely to get injured playing against a man, unless it's me.
What I understand of golf through familial osmosis, your swing largely depends on your height and hips and correctly applying the force your body can generate with that motion. Relative height and hip strength differences can be negated by skill but when you have a 5'10" minimum "woman" going against women who are 5'8" max, there's a physiological benefit at play.
 

fuckidunno

kiwifarms.net
hmmm some interesting things there
2021-05-04 07_04_43-Window.png

*The consensus appears"
appears to whom?Is there consensus? Is there a consensus statement by an organization or body? How have we decided on use a Frye or Daubert standard

"The converse would be those that have experienced a puberty would have an 'unfair advantage' in sport. Although there may be merit in this discussion, it is not a converstion we should be having in this space in this moment"

-As it is the converse, it is dealing with the same logical elements. So why would it not be part of the conversation? perhaps because it does not necessarily promote your ideology?
-Isn't it the "it's never time to talk about it/back burner" frustration that fueled BLM, Evergreen State College, etc? Would you, then, likewise allow for "this isn't the time for that discussion" regarding other social issues? say, transgender issues?
Why would YOUR SPECIFIC issue regarding hormonal/sexual development and its implications in sport be the only one to be discussed by your unanimous decree?

"Be able to participate in the sport of their choice among their gender peers"

-
Why if, as you mention, "school sport is about health, social bonding...participating in physical contests in a healthy fashion/sportmanship" , would "gender peers"? Certainly it's not about any advantage as you yourself call talk about unfair advantage "nonsense" based on that purpose of sport.

-Given the asserted purpose of school sport, why is the notion of non-competitive sport NOT even acknowledged?

-working in a "gender peers" framework would be exclusionary. what if the individual has no gender peers (is agender, non-conforming, of a conforming gender with no available peer group)
It also FORCES the individual to DISCLOSE/DECLARE GENDER in order to participate

the whole presentation is EXTREMELY trans-centric and serves to further marginalize the already marginalized non-binary community and individual.
 
Last edited:

manlikebigp

You ever wonder why we’re here?
kiwifarms.net
hmmm some interesting things there
View attachment 2141719
*The consensus appears"
appears to whom?Is there consensus? Is there a consensus statement by an organization or body? How have we decided on use a Frye or Daubert standard

"The converse would be those that have experienced a puberty would have an 'unfair advantage' in sport. Although there may be merit in this discussion, it is not a converstion we should be having in this space in this moment"

-As it is the converse, it is dealing with the same logical elements. So why would it not be part of the conversation? perhaps because it does not necessarily promote your ideology?
-Isn't it the "it's never time to talk about it/back burner" frustration that fueled BLM, Evergreen State College, etc? Would you, then, likewise allow for "this isn't the time for that discussion" regarding other social issues? say, transgender issues?
Why would YOUR SPECIFIC issue regarding hormonal/sexual development and its implications in sport be the only one to be discussed by your unanimous decree?

"Be able to participate in the sport of their choice among their gender peers"

-
Why if, as you mention, "school sport is about health, social bonding...participating in physical contests in a healthy fashion/sportmanship" , would "gender peers"? Certainly it's not about any advantage as you yourself call talk about unfair advantage "nonsense" based on that purpose of sport.

-Given the asserted purpose of school sport, why is the notion of non-competitive sport NOT even acknowledged?

-working in a "gender peers" framework would be exclusionary. what if the individual has no gender peers (is agender, non-conforming, of a conforming gender with no available peer group)
It also FORCES the individual to DISCLOSE/DECLARE GENDER in order to participate

the whole presentation is EXTREMELY trans-centric and serves to further marginalize the already marginalized non-binary community and individual.
That whole post is retarded simply because the tranny hivemind can never be even remotely anti-trans. When discussing things like this, they should be nearly completely excluded from the conversation otherwise it sounds like:
"Should kids be forced to be naked at all times? We asked 15 paedophiles to find out!"
 

Shovel Mech Pilot

Backhoe Firestarter
kiwifarms.net
*The consensus appears"
appears to whom?Is there consensus? Is there a consensus statement by an organization or body? How have we decided on use a Frye or Daubert standard
"We will get you fired from your job or send you death threats if you disagree. Now we will declare a consensus and form a crusade against you if you contract it. The consensus is clear!"
 

Law

hates dogs, loves vicodin
kiwifarms.net
All the troonic sports-sperging has got me thinking: why don't we ever see brave and beautiful trans girls do gymnastics, or dance? It's the stereotypical girly sport. The outfits can have rhinestones. Why do they always want to intrude on stuff like golf, powerlifting, cycling, and rugby?
Is it because you need a real athletic female body to succeed in gymnastics and they know they could never?
I'd love to see one of these pudgy middle-aged men fall over in a leotard.
 

EggNazi

Eggs are equal to Nazi propaganda.
kiwifarms.net
All the troonic sports-sperging has got me thinking: why don't we ever see brave and beautiful trans girls do gymnastics, or dance? It's the stereotypical girly sport. The outfits can have rhinestones. Why do they always want to intrude on stuff like golf, powerlifting, cycling, and rugby?
Is it because you need a real athletic female body to succeed in gymnastics and they know they could never?
I'd love to see one of these pudgy middle-aged men fall over in a leotard.
Real answer being female bodies are simply more flexible at the hip joints specifically, meaning a man would rarely if ever be able to compete in gymnastics against women. Women do have advantage in some sports for that reason, but men dominate the field in most places. My guess is these men don't stand a chance against other men in sport so they have to try to stroke their egos by competing against women who they know they don't have a chance against. I'd love to see a fat sloppy troon try to have the advantage gymnastics and just give up while crying.
 

CrystalChevvy

kiwifarms.net
Somewhere, the Vikings are crying.

I mean, LaBell is talking about this in terms of gender-neutral names because he doesn't understand any better.

Iceland still has men's names and women's names, as dictated by tradition. Guðrún, Anna and Helga are still women's names. Just because a man isn't blocked from calling himself Helga doesn't mean it's not a woman's name. Iceland aren't doing anything progressive or gender reaffirming here, they're just loosening up their rules to what other western countries have been doing since long before the troon wars got started. Same as in other western countries, if a man wants to name himself Jeanette in the UK, nobody's going to stop him. If a woman wants to not go by the last name of Larsson (technically gendered because it's derived from son of Lars), she can change her last name to Smith. But the overweight Icelandic AGP with a 5 o'clock shadow who goes by the name of Margrét is still a man with a woman's name.
 

Papa Adolfo's Take'n'Bake

It's screamin' good.
kiwifarms.net
What I love is how the left switch between ”Nazism is a capitalist ideology” and ”Nazism is a socialist ideology” depending on which one is most convenient for their argument du jour.
I am personally a fan of watching them realize they've devalued the word from overuse and have ostracized so many with that same word that they have hit the "oh, SHIT time to backtrack." Eepecially as they realize their once mighty cliques have denigrated to Labelle the Pedo & Co.
 

Marshal Mannerheim

Koti, uskonto, ja isänmaa.
kiwifarms.net
I am personally a fan of watching them realize they've devalued the word from overuse and have ostracized so many with that same word that they have hit the "oh, SHIT time to backtrack."
I'd assume that was why ”alt-right” became a thing. Calling everyone Nazis for 70 years means that the word ”Nazi” starts to lose its power, so these people needed an alternative.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3K
Views
459K
  • Locked
The Incredible Adventures of Stephie (Who Won't Shut Up About Being Trans)
Replies
4K
Views
160K
Top